Team | Position | Key Strengths | Main Weaknesses | xG Differential |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kongsvinger | 1st | Counter-attacking pace, clinical finishing | Susceptible to set-pieces | +0.91 |
Sogndal | 2nd | Young, dynamic midfield; tactical flexibility | Occasional defensive lapses under pressure | +0.73 |
Start | 4th | Set-piece execution, experienced core | Struggles breaking down low blocks | +0.55 |
Ranheim | 8th | High tempo, relentless pressing | Weak fullback coverage | +0.12 |
Moss | 13th | Solid defensive transitions, quick wingers | Limited depth, low attacking variance | -0.37 |
Match | Market | Stake (%) | Odds Range | Value Rationale |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sogndal v Ranheim | Sogndal Win + BTTS | 2.5 | 2.90–3.20 | Sogndal home form + Ranheim’s leaky defense |
Kongsvinger v Moss | Kongsvinger -1 Handicap | 3.0 | 2.00–2.10 | Moss missing main striker, away goal shy |
Fredrikstad v Start | Over 2.5 Goals | 2.0 | 1.65–1.80 | Both teams’ average >3 goals/game in H2H |