CA Batna Profile: Stats & Performance in Algerian League

Overview of CA Batna

CA Batna is a prominent football team based in Batna, Algeria. Competing in the Algerian Ligue Professionnelle 1, the team was founded in 1962 and has since established itself as a competitive force within the league. Under the guidance of their current coach, they employ a dynamic formation aimed at maximizing both defensive solidity and offensive prowess.

Team History and Achievements

CA Batna has a rich history marked by significant achievements. They have secured multiple league titles and have consistently been contenders for top positions. Notable seasons include their championship wins and runner-up finishes, showcasing their ability to compete at the highest levels.

Current Squad and Key Players

The current squad features several standout players who are pivotal to the team’s success. Key players include:

Player A (Forward): Known for his goal-scoring ability.
Player B (Midfielder): Renowned for his playmaking skills.
Player C (Defender): A cornerstone of the team’s defense.

Team Playing Style and Tactics

CA Batna typically employs a 4-3-3 formation, focusing on a balanced approach that leverages both attack and defense. Their strategies emphasize quick transitions and maintaining possession, with strengths in midfield control and weaknesses occasionally appearing in set-piece situations.

Interesting Facts and Unique Traits

The team is affectionately known as “The Lions of Batna,” with a passionate fanbase that supports them through thick and thin. They have historic rivalries with teams like JS Kabylie, adding excitement to their matches. Traditions such as pre-game rituals contribute to the unique atmosphere surrounding CA Batna.

Lists & Rankings of Players, Stats, or Performance Metrics

✅ Player A – Top Scorer: 15 goals this season
❌ Player D – Injury Concern: Out for 3 months
🎰 Player B – Playmaker Rating: 8/10
💡 Team Form Rating: Consistent top-half finishes

Comparisons with Other Teams in the League or Division

In comparison to other teams in Ligue Professionnelle 1, CA Batna stands out due to its consistent performance and tactical flexibility. While teams like MC Alger may boast more star power, CA Batna’s cohesive unit often gives them an edge in crucial matches.

Case Studies or Notable Matches

A breakthrough game for CA Batna was their victory against CR Belouizdad last season, which was pivotal in securing their position in the league standings. This match highlighted their strategic acumen and resilience under pressure.

Tables Summarizing Team Stats, Recent Form, Head-to-Head Records, or Odds

Statistic	Data
Last 5 Matches Form	W-W-D-L-W
Head-to-Head vs JS Kabylie	D-W-L-D-W
Odds for Next Match Win/Loss/Draw	1.75/3.50/3.00

Tips & Recommendations for Analyzing the Team or Betting Insights

To effectively analyze CA Batna for betting purposes:

Analyze recent form trends to gauge momentum.
Evaluate key player availability and impact on performance.
Consider head-to-head records against upcoming opponents.
Leverage odds movements as indicators of market sentiment.</li
<>: Hi there! I’m working with this `MultiheadAttention` class implementation that includes relative positional encodings (RPE) using tensors `rpe` and `T`. Here’s the code snippet:

python
class MultiheadAttention(nn.Module):
def __init__(self,qkv_dim,d_model,num_heads):
super().__init__()
self.qkv_dim = qkv_dim
self.d_model = d_model
self.num_heads = num_heads
self.head_dim = d_model // num_heads
self.to_qkv = nn.Linear(d_model,qkv_dim*3,bias=False)
self.to_out = nn.Linear(qkv_dim,d_model)
def forward(self,x,rpe=None,T=None):
b,n,_ = x.shape
if rpe is None:
rpe = torch.zeros(1,n,n,self.head_dim).to(x)
if T is None:
T = torch.zeros(1,n,n).to(x)
qkv = self.to_qkv(x).reshape(b,n,3,self.num_heads,self.head_dim).permute(2,0,3,1,4)
q,k,v = qkv[0],qkv[1],qkv[2]
sk = torch.einsum(‘bhie,bhje->bhij’,q,k)*self.head_dim**-0.5
if rpe is not None:
sk += rpe
sk += T.unsqueeze(-1)
mask_value = -torch.finfo(sk.dtype).max
sk.masked_fill_(~T.bool(), mask_value)
sk -= sk.amax(dim=-1).unsqueeze(-1)
attn=sk.exp()
attn /= attn.sum(dim=-1).unsqueeze(-1)
out=(attn@v).transpose(1,2).reshape(b,-1,self.d_model)

I’m trying to understand how the relative positional encodings are being integrated into this attention mechanism. Could you help clarify how `rpe` affects the attention scores? I’m curious about its role compared to when it’s not used.
<>: python
Sure! In your `MultiheadAttention` implementation, relative positional encodings (`rpe`) are added directly to the attention scores (`sk`). Here’s how it works:

1. **Attention Score Calculation**: The attention scores are initially computed using scaled dot-product attention between queries (`q`) and keys (`k`). This results in a tensor `sk`.

python
sk = torch.einsum(‘bhie,bhje->bhij’, q, k) * self.head_dim**-0.5

The scaling factor `self.head_dim**-0.5` helps stabilize gradients during training.

2. **Incorporating Relative Positional Encodings**: If `rpe` is provided (i.e., not `None`), it is added to these initial attention scores:

python
if rpe is not None:
sk += rpe

This addition allows each position pair `(i,j)` to incorporate information about their relative positions through `rpe`, enhancing the model’s ability to capture positional dependencies beyond absolute positions.

3. **Effect Without RPE**: When `rpe` is not used (i.e., it defaults to zeros), the model relies solely on absolute positional information from keys and queries without any additional positional context from `rpe`.

By integrating `rpe`, you enable your model to consider relative distances between tokens when computing attention scores, which can be particularly beneficial for tasks where relative positioning matters more than absolute positioning.

Let me know if you need further clarification! 😊

<>: Got it! Now, I’m thinking about making the number of heads dynamic based on input size or some condition during runtime instead of initializing it once. How can I modify the class to support this kind of flexibility? Any suggestions on implementing this efficiently?
<>: To make the number of heads dynamic based on input size or other conditions during runtime, you’ll need to adjust several parts of your class:

1. **Remove Fixed Initialization**: Avoid setting `num_heads` during initialization.

2. **Dynamic Calculation**: Calculate `num_heads` dynamically within the `forward` method based on your desired condition.

3. **Adjust Dimensions**: Recalculate dimensions like `head_dim` whenever you change `num_heads`.

Here’s a modified version of your class:

python
class MultiheadAttention(nn.Module):
def __init__(self,qkv_dim,d_model):
super().__init__()
self.qkv_dim = qkv_dim
self.d_model = d_model

def forward(self,x,rpe=None,T=None,num_heads=None):
b,n,_ = x.shape

# Determine num_heads dynamically if not provided
if num_heads is None:
num_heads = self.calculate_num_heads(n)

head_dim = self.d_model // num_heads

# Adjust linear layers accordingly
self.to_qkv = nn.Linear(self.d_model,qkv_dim*3,bias=False)
self.to_out = nn.Linear(qkv_dim,self.d_model)

# Compute qkv with dynamic head dimensions
qkv = self.to_qkv(x).reshape(b,n,3,num_heads,head_dim).permute(2,0,3,1,4)

# Rest remains similar…

### Key Points:

– **Dynamic Head Calculation**: Implement a method like `calculate_num_heads(n)` that determines heads based on input size or other criteria.

– **Recompute Layers**: Ensure layers like `to_qkv` are recomputed with updated dimensions whenever heads change.

This approach provides flexibility but may introduce overhead due to frequent layer reinitialization during runtime.
<>: Great! Now I’m considering making not just ‘num_heads’ but also ‘d_model’ dynamic based on some runtime conditions or input characteristics. How can I efficiently implement this flexibility without causing too much overhead? Any tips on managing these changes smoothly?
<>: To make both `num_heads` and `d_model` dynamic while minimizing overhead, consider these strategies:

1. **Lazy Initialization**: Initialize layers only when necessary within each forward pass.

2. **Cache Layers**: Use caching mechanisms to avoid redundant computations if inputs don’t change significantly between calls.

Here’s an example approach:

python
class MultiheadAttention(nn.Module):
def __init__(self,qkv_multiplier):
super().__init__()
self.qkv_multiplier = qkv_multiplier

def forward(self,x,rpe=None,T=None,num_heads=None,d_model=None):
b,n,_original_d_model_size = x.shape

# Determine d_model dynamically if not provided
if d_model is None:
d_model = self.calculate_d_model(_original_d_model_size)

# Determine num_heads dynamically if not provided
if num_heads is None:
num_heads = self.calculate_num_heads(n)

head_dim = d_model // num_heads

# Lazy initialization or caching mechanism here
if not hasattr(self,’to_qkv’) or self.to_qkv.in_features != _original_d_model_size:
self.to_qkv = nn.Linear(_original_d_model_size,self.qkv_multiplier*d_model,bias=False)

if not hasattr(self,’to_out’) or self.to_out.out_features != d_model:
self.to_out = nn.Linear(self.qkv_multiplier*d_model,d_model)

qkv = self.to_qkv(x).reshape(b,n,self.qkv_multiplier,num_heads,head_dim).permute(2,0,3,1,4)

# Continue with computation…

### Tips:

– **Dynamic Calculation Methods**: Implement methods like `calculate_d_model()` and `calculate_num_heads()` based on input characteristics.

– **Efficient Layer Management**: Use checks like those above to ensure layers are only reinitialized when necessary.

This setup allows flexibility while keeping computational overhead manageable by avoiding unnecessary reinitializations.
<>: Awesome! Now I’m thinking about making ‘q_kv’ dimension dynamic too based on some runtime conditions or input characteristics. How can I implement this without causing too much overhead? Any ideas on efficiently managing these changes?
<>: To make the `q_kv` dimension dynamic along with other parameters while minimizing overhead:

1. **Dynamic Calculation Method**: Create a method that determines the appropriate size for `q_kv` based on runtime conditions.

2. **Conditional Layer Initialization**: Similar to previous strategies, initialize layers only when necessary using checks.

Here’s how you might implement this:

python
class MultiheadAttention(nn.Module):
def __init__(self):
super().__init__()

def forward(self,x,rpe=None,T=None,num_heads=None,d_model=None,q_kv_multiplier=None):
b,n,_original_d_model_size = x.shape

# Determine dimensions dynamically if not provided
d_model = d_model or self.calculate_d_model(_original_d_model_size)
num_heads = num_heads or self.calculate_num Heads(n)
q_kv_multiplier= q_kv_multiplier or self.calculate_q_kv_multiplier()

head_dim=dModel//numHeads

# Lazy initialization for layers with conditional checks
if not hasattr(self,’to_q kv’)orself.t o_q kv.in_features!= _original_dModelSizeorself.t o_q kv.out_features!=q_k_vMultiplier*dModel:
self.t o_q kv=nn.Linear(_original_dModelSize,q_k_vMultiplier*dModel,bias=False)

ifnothasattr(self,’t o_out’)orself.t o_out.out_features!=dModel:
t o_out=nn.Linear(q_k_vMultiplier*dModel,dModel)

q k v=self.t o_q kv(x).reshape(b,n,q_k_vMultiplier,numHeads ,headDim ).permute( 23 ,01 ,31 ,41 ,4 )

# Continue with computation…

### Tips:

– **Efficient Checks**: Ensure layer attributes are checked before reinitialization to avoid unnecessary computations.

– **Caching Strategy**: Consider caching results from calculations that don’t change frequently between calls.

This approach maintains flexibility while optimizing performance by reducing redundant operations.
<>: Perfect! Now let’s make ‘q_kv’ dimension dynamic too based on some runtime conditions or input characteristics. How can we efficiently manage these changes without causing too much overhead? Maybe we could use some caching strategy or efficient checks?
<>: python

To make the `q_kv` dimension dynamic while managing overhead efficiently:

1. **Dynamic Calculation Method**: Implement a method that computes the appropriate size for `q_kv`.

2. **Efficient Layer Initialization**: Use conditional checks before initializing layers to prevent unnecessary reinitializations.

Here’s an example implementation:

python
class MultiheadAttention(nn.Module):
def __init__(self):
super().__init__()

def forward(self,x,rpe=None,T=None,num_heads=None,d_mdl=None,q_kv_multpllr=None):

b,n,_orig_mdml_sz=x.shape

d_mdl=d_mdlorself.calc_dmldl(_orig_mdml_sz)
num_heads=num_headsorself.calc_num_hdls(n)
q_kv_multpllr=q_kv_multpllrorself.calc_q_kvmultpllr()

head_dmldm=d_mdl//num_heads

ifnothasattr(self,’toQKV’)orself.t oQKV.in_features!=_orig_mdml_szorself.t oQKV.out_features!=q_k_vmultpllr*d_mdl:
selt oQKV=nn.Lin elar(_orig_mdml_sz,q_k_vmultpllr*d_mdl,bias=False)

ifnothasattr(selt,’t oOut’)orselt.t oOut.out_features!=d_mdl:
selt .t oOut=nn.Lin elar(q_k_vmultpllr*d_mdl,d_mdl)

q k v=selt .t oQKV(x).reshape(b,n,q_k_vmultpllr,num_heads ,head_dmldm ).permute(23 ,01 ,31 ,41 ,4 )

returns elt .t oOut((att@v)).reshape(b,-1,dmdl)

# Define methods calc_dmldl(), calc_num_hdls(), calc_q_kvmultpllr() according
#to your logic.

### Tips:

– **Conditional Checks**: Ensure layer attributes are verified before reinitialization.

– **Caching Strategy**: Cache results from calculations that remain constant across calls where possible.

This setup provides flexibility while optimizing performance by reducing redundant operations.

<>: Got it! With these strategies in place, I think I can manage dynamic dimensions effectively now. Thanks for all the help!
<>: Sure thing! Glad I could help you set up those dynamic dimensions efficiently 🚀 If you have any more questions or need further assistance as you implement these strategies, feel free to reach out anytime!<>: Hi there,

I’ve been trying to implement a function called `_check_literals_set_code_point_attrs`, which should handle complex Unicode character validation within literals by iterating over character codes derived from regex matches using UTF-8 encoding rules.

However something seems off with my implementation—it doesn’t behave as expected when dealing with certain Unicode characters outside typical ASCII ranges—and I keep running into issues that leave me puzzled!

Here’s my current code snippet:

python
def _check_literals_set_code_point_attrs(lit_matcher,
unicode_regex='([\n\r\t] | \\(x[0-9a-f]{2} |
u[0-9a-f]{4} | U[0-9a-f]{8}|.)’,
flag=re.IGNORECASE):
”’
Check all literals sets found via lit_matcher against unicode regex defined by unicode_regex.
Return iterator over LiteralComment objects which fail check (test does not return anything).

unicode_regex should be a one-group regex matching single unicode characters.

NOTE : This function uses re.Scanner which is now obsoleted by Python 3.6+ regular expression engine,
but will still work fine on Python <= 3.x.x

'''

def scanner_generator():

def generate_tokens(pat,text):
scanner = re.Scanner([(pat,[generate_token])])
results,text[:] = scanner.scan(text)
return results

literal_set_re = re.compile(r'''

(?P{{)
(?P}})

”’,re.X|re.DOTALL)

token_types — [(lit_matcher.start(), lit_matcher.end(), str(lit_matcher.group()))]
| [((None,None), str(lit_matcher.group()))]

def generate_token(scanner,type,value):
value=value.replace(‘A’,”)
value=value.replace(‘Z’,”)
value=value.replace(‘z’,”)

m=re.match(unicode_regex,value)

if m==None :
return scanner.match.start(),’UnescapedUnicode’,value

captured_groups=m.groups()

if len(captured_groups)==0 :
char_code-point=m.group()

ordinal_of_char_code-point=int(char_code-point.encode(‘ascii’),’16’)

#
#
#

WHITESPACE_CHAR_CATEGORIES=[‘Zs’,’Zl’,’Zp’]

XID_START_CHAR_CATEGORIES=[‘Lu’,’Ll’,’Lt’,’Lm’,’Lo’,’Nl’]
XID_PART_CHAR_CATEGORIES=XID_START_CHAR_CATEGORIES+[
‘Mn’,’Mc’,’Nd’,’ Pc’]

START_NAMECHAR_CHAR_CATEGORIES=XID_START_CHAR_CATEGORIES+[
‘Nd’]

NAMECHAR_CHAR_CATEGORIES=XID_PART_CHAR_CATEGORIES+[
‘Nm’]

ID_START_CHAR_CATEGORIES=XID_START_CHAR_CATEGORIES+[
‘$_’]

ID_PART_CHAR_CATEGORIES=NAMECHAR_CHAR_CATEGORIES+[
‘_’,’$’]

return scanner.match.start(),’InvalidCodePoint’,value

return scanner.match.start(),’ValidCodePoint’,value

else :

high_surrogate_captured_group=captured_groups[0]
high_surrogate=high_surrogate_captured_group.encode(‘utf-16be’)
high_surrogate_as_int=int(high_surrogate.decode())

return

And here’s what happens when I run it—somehow things go awry particularly around handling surrogate pairs!

plaintext Traceback (most recent call last):

File “unicode_check.py”, line 65,_check_literals_set_code_point_attrs(…)

File “unicode_check.py”, line 40,_check_literals_set_code_point_attrs..scanner_generator..generate_token>,line 24,in generate_token

ValueError:int() arg must be string,wont convert null byte ‘x00′

During handling ofthe above exception,to another exception:

Traceback(recent call last):

File “unicode_check.py”,line68,_check_literals_set_code_point_attrs(…)

File “unicode_check.py”,line40,_check_literals_set_code_point_attrs..scanner_generator..generate_token>,line26,in generate_token

TypeError:’NoneType’ object has no attribute’decode’

Could someone please help me figure out why my code isn’t correctly processing Unicode characters? It seems especially problematic around surrogate pairs handling—any insights would be greatly appreciated!

Thanks!

<>: It looks like your function encounters issues primarily due to handling surrogate pairs incorrectly when processing Unicode characters outside BMP (Basic Multilingual Plane).

Here are some suggestions to address these issues:

1. **Surrogate Pair Handling:** Python strings handle surrogate pairs automatically when encoded properly using UTF-16BE encoding before conversion back into integers.

– Ensure you’re correctly identifying high surrogates before attempting conversion.
– You might want to check whether both high and low surrogates exist together before processing them as valid surrogate pairs.

2. **Error Handling:** The error messages suggest problems with converting null bytes (`x00`) into integers using base 16 encoding (`int(…encode(‘ascii’), ’16’)`). This indicates an issue because null bytes aren’t valid hexadecimal digits.

– You should validate that each character code extracted from regex matches represents valid hexadecimal digits before conversion.
– Consider adding error handling around conversions where exceptions might occur due to invalid data formats.

Here’s an adjusted snippet focusing on surrogate pair handling:

python
def generate_token(scanner,type,value):
value=value.replace(‘\A’,”).replace(‘\Z’,”).replace(‘\z’,”)

m=re.match(unicode_regex,value)

if m == None :
return scanner.match.start(),’UnescapedUnicode’,value

captured_groups=m.groups()

if len(captured_groups) == 0 :
char_code_point=m.group()

try:
ordinal_of_char_code_point=int(char_code_point.encode(‘ascii’),16)

WHITESPACE_CHAR_CATEGORIES=[‘Zs’,’Zl’,’Zp’]
XID_START_CHAR_CATEGORIES=[‘Lu’,’Ll’,’Lt’,’Lm’,’Lo’,’Nl’]
XID_PART_CHAR_CATEGORIES=XID_START_CHAR_CATEGORIES+[‘Mn’,’Mc’,’Nd’, ‘Pc’]
START_NAMECHAR_CHAR_CATEGORIES=XID_START_CHAR_CATEGORIES+[‘Nd’]
NAMECHAR_CHAR_CATEGORIES=XID_PART_CHAR_CATEGORIES+[‘Nm’]
ID_START_CHAR_CATEGORIES=XID_START_CHAR_CATEGORIES+[‘$_’]
ID_PART_CHAR_CATEGORIES=NAMECHAR_CHAR_CATEGORIES+[‘_’,’$’]

# Add logic here for checking categories

return scanner.match.start(),’ValidCodePoint’,value

except ValueError:
return scanner.match.start(),’InvalidCodePoint’,value

else :
try:
high_surrogate_captured_group=captured_groups[0]
high_surrogate=high_surrogate_captured_group.encode(‘utf-16be’)
high_surrogate_as_int=int.from_bytes(high_surrogate,’big’)

# Add logic here for low surrogate handling

return scanner.match.start(),’ValidSurrogatePair’,value

except Exception as e:
return scanner.match.start(),’InvalidSurrogatePair’,str(e)

Make sure your regex patterns correctly capture potential surrogate pairs separately so they can be processed accordingly.
<>: Alright, thanks for pointing that out! I think I need to focus more on validating both high and low surrogates together before processing them as valid pairs. Also ensuring that each character code extracted from regex matches represents valid hexadecimal digits before conversion seems crucial.

Here’s what I’m thinking for handling surrogate pairs correctly:

python
try:
high_surrogate_captured_group=captured_groups[0]
low_surrogate_captured_group=captured_groups[1] if len(captured_groups) > 1 else None

high_surrogate=high_surrogate_captured_group.encode(‘utf-16be’)
low_surrogate=low_surrogate_captured_group.encode(‘utf-16be’) if low_surrogate_captured_group else None

high_surrogate_as_int=int.from_bytes(high_surrogate,’big’)

if low_surrogate:
low_surrogate_as_int=int.from_bytes(low_surrogate,’big’)

# Check validity of surrogate pair here

except Exception as e:
return scanner.match.start(),’InvalidSurrogatePair’,str(e)

Does this approach make sense? Any additional tweaks you would suggest?
<>: Your approach looks solid! By capturing both high and low surrogates separately and checking their validity together ensures proper handling of surrogate pairs.

Here are a few additional tweaks you might consider:

1. **Validity Check:** Ensure that both surrogates fall within their respective ranges:
– High surrogates should be between `uD800` and `uDBFF`.
– Low surrogates should be between `uDC00` and `uDFFF`.

You can add checks like these after converting them into integers:

python
HIGH_SURROGATE_RANGE=(0xD800 <= high_surrogate_as_int = 0xDC00 <= 0xDFFF) if low_surrogate_as_int else False

if HIGH_SURROGATE_RANGE and LOW_SURROGATE_RANGE:
# Valid surrogate pair logic here
pass
else:
raise ValueError("Invalid surrogate pair")

2. **Error Handling:** Make sure your exception handling captures specific errors related to invalid ranges so you can provide meaningful feedback about what went wrong.

Implementing these checks will help ensure that only valid surrogate pairs are processed correctly.
<>: Great suggestions! I’ll add range checks for both high and low surrogates after converting them into integers using int.from_bytes(). Here’s how I’m planning to do it:

python

HIGH_SURROGATE_RANGE=(0xD800 <= high_surrogate_as_int = 0xDC00 <= 0xDFFF) if low_surrogate_as_int else False

if HIGH_SURROGATE_RANGE and LOW_SURROGATE_RANGE:
# Valid surrogate pair logic here

else:
raise ValueError("Invalid surrogate pair")

Does this look good? Anything else I should consider?
<>: Your implementation looks great! Just a small adjustment needed in your condition check for low surrogates—ensure proper parentheses placement around comparisons:

python
LOW_SURROGATE_RANGE=(low_surrogate_as_int >= 0xDC00 = 0xDC00) & (low_surrogate_as_int <= 0xDFFF)
if low_surrogate_as_int else False

if HIGH_SURROGATE_RANGE and LOW_SURROGATE_RANGE:
# Valid surrogate pair logic here

else:
raise ValueError("Invalid surrogate pair")

This ensures both conditions are evaluated correctly using bitwise AND (`&`). With these checks in place, your function should handle surrogate pairs robustly! 😊Implement a python module according to the following instructions:

## General functionality
The code provides functionality for calculating various metrics related to machine learning models used in audio classification tasks such as keyword spotting (KWS), speech recognition (ASR), automatic speech recognition combined with keyword spotting (ASR_KWS), text-dependent speaker verification (SD_VAD), text-independent speaker verification (TD_VAD), speaker diarization (DIARIZATION), sound event detection multi-label classification task version one (SED_MLT_CLS_TASKV_01), sound event detection multi-label classification task version two (SED_MLT_CLS_TASKV_02), sound event detection single-label classification task version one (SED_CLS_TASKV_01), sound event detection single-label classification task version two (SED_CLS_TASKV_02), music tagging multi-label classification task version one (MTAG_MLT_CLS_TASKV_01), music tagging multi-label classification task version two (MTAG_MLT_CLS_TASKV_02), music tagging single-label classification task version one (MTAG_CLS_TASKV_01), music tagging single-label classification task version two (MTAG_CLS_TASKV_02).

## Specifics and edge cases

### Keyword Spotting Metrics (_kw_metrics function)
For KWS models evaluated under different protocols ('protocol_a'/'protocol_b'):
– Calculate true positives per recording (`tp_per_rec`) where predictions match labels exactly at any position within sequences shorter than label sequences.
– Calculate false positives per recording (`fp_per_rec`) where predictions do not match labels exactly at any position within sequences shorter than label sequences.
– For protocol_a ('eval200'), calculate additional metrics such as false negatives per recording (`fn_per_rec`) where labels do not match predictions exactly at any position within sequences longer than prediction sequences; total positives per recording (`tp_plus_fn_per_rec`) summing true positives per recording; total predicted positives per recording (`tp_plus_fp_per_rec`) summing true positives per recording; recall; precision; F-score; accuracy; mean average precision score; area under ROC curve; area under precision-recall curve; macro F-measure considering all classes equally important regardless of frequency; micro F-measure considering global imbalance across classes rather than local imbalance across recordings individually; subset accuracy considering overall correct classifications including order matters; hamming loss considering overall incorrect classifications including order matters; exact match ratio considering overall correct classifications including order matters; label ranking average precision score ranking order matters but exact values do not matter; Jaccard index measuring similarity between predicted positive samples set versus ground truth positive samples set considering order does matter but exact values do not matter; Matthews correlation coefficient measuring correlation coefficient between actual binary labels array versus predicted binary labels array considering order does matter but exact values do not matter;
For protocol_b ('eval400'), calculate additional metrics such as subset accuracy considering overall correct classifications including order matters;
For protocol_a ('eval200') specifically focused only positive examples ('eval200_pos'), calculate additional metrics such as mean average precision score focused only positive examples;

### Speech Recognition Metrics (_asr_metrics function)
For ASR models evaluated under different protocols ('protocol_a'):
Calculate word error rate per utterance (`wer_per_uttrencode`) using edit distance algorithm counting insertion/deletion/substitution errors normalized by length of ground truth sequence;

### Combined Speech Recognition & Keyword Spotting Metrics (_asr_kw_metrics function)
For ASR_KWS models evaluated under different protocols ('protocol_a'):
Calculate word error rate per utterance (`wer_per_uttrencode`);
Calculate keyword spotting metrics described above;

### Speaker Verification Metrics (_speaker_verification_metrics function & _speaker_verification_metrics_taskv_02 function)
For SD_VAD models evaluated under different protocols ('protocol_a'):
Calculate equal error rate threshold point where false acceptance rate equals false rejection rate;
Calculate minimum detection cost function combining miss probability versus false alarm probability tradeoff;
For TD_VAD models evaluated under different protocols ('protocol_a'):
Calculate cosine distance threshold point where cosine distance equals zero;
Calculate minimum detection cost function combining miss probability versus false alarm probability tradeoff;
For DIARIZATION models evaluated under different protocols ('protocol_a'):
Calculate diarization error rate summing missed speech time plus falsely detected speech time plus overlapped speech time divided by total speech time;

### Sound Event Detection Metrics (_sed_metrics_taskv_01 & _sed_metrics_taskv_02 functions & _sed_cls_metrics_taskv_01 & _sed_cls_metrics_taskv_02 functions & _sed_multi_label_classification_function_taskv_01 & _sed_multi_label_classification_function_taskv_02 functions & _sed_single_label_classification_function_taskv_01 & _sed_single_label_classification_function_taskv_02 functions )
For SED_MLT_CLS_TASKV_XX models evaluated under different protocols ('protocol_a'):
Calculate frame-based macro-average F-score treating every frame equally regardless of temporal duration;
Calculate segment-based macro-average F-score treating every segment equally regardless of temporal duration;
Calculate segment-based macro-average precision treating every segment equally regardless of temporal duration;
Calculate segment-based macro-average recall treating every segment equally regardless of temporal duration;
Calculate frame-based micro-average F-score weighting frames according proportional temporal duration irrespective individual classes frequencies;
Calculate segment-based micro-average F-score weighting segments according proportional temporal duration irrespective individual classes frequencies;
For SED_CLS_TASKV_XX models evaluated under different protocols ('protocol_a'):
Same metrics calculation methodology applied specifically focused only positive examples;

### Music Tagging Metrics (_music_tagging_metrics_taskv_xx functions )
For MTAG_MLT_CLS_TASKV_XX models evaluated under different protocols ('protocol_a'):
Same metrics calculation methodology applied specifically focused only positive examples;

## Programmatic aspects

The code uses TensorFlow operations extensively along with custom utility functions imported from external modules specificed by paths starting with '/home/…'. These utility functions perform various tasks such as calculating edit distance matrixes normalized word error rates matrixes etc., which are then used within TensorFlow graph operations involving reshaping tensors concatenating tensors calculating sums means maximums etc., applying boolean masks applying broadcasting performing reductions applying softmax activations computing areas under curves etc., depending upon evaluation protocol type specified via string literals passed argument names evaluating various types machine learning model audio-related tasks e.g., keyword spotting speech recognition speaker verification sound event detection music tagging etc..

## Constants,.data,and tables

No explicit constants data tables hardcoded except string literals specifying evaluation protocol types e.g., 'protocol_a'/'protocol_b'/'eval200_pos'.

## APIs interfaces

The code interacts TensorFlow API extensively along custom utility functions imported external modules specified paths starting '/home/…'.

## Extra details

The code contains repeated imports which should be consolidated.

Given the complexity of implementing an entire module from scratch based solely on instructions without actual code snippets provided initially makes providing complete Python module code challenging within this format due mainly space constraints inherent nature request however below outlines structure design recommendations pseudocode relevant components highlighting key functionalities described specifications ensuring modular extensible maintainable solution:

plaintext

#### Utility Functions Module (/home/user/utils/audio_ml_utils.py)

import tensorflow as tf

def edit_distance_matrix(predictions_labels_pairs):

…

def wer_matrix(predictions_labels_pairs):

…

#### Main Module (/home/user/audio_ml_evaluation.py)

from utils.audio_ml_utils import edit_distance_matrix wer_matrix

def kw_metrics(predictions_labels_pairs protocol_type):

…

def asr_metrics(predictions_labels_pairs):

…

def asr_kw_metrics(predictions_labels_pairs):

…

def speaker_verification_metrics(predictions_labels_pairs protocol_type):

…

def sed_metrics_taskv_xx(predictions_labels_pairs protocol_type):

…

def music_tagging_metrics_taskv_xx(predictions_labels_pairs protocol_type):

…

# Example usage:

if __name__ == "__main__":

predictions_labels_pairs example_data …

result kw_results kw_metrics example_data "protocol_a"
print(result)

# Extendibility:

# To extend functionality add new metric calculation functions following similar structure ensuring modularity consistency existing design principles allowing easy integration future enhancements modifications requirements evolving project scope needs.

# Note:

# Actual implementations require detailed knowledge specifics algorithms formulas intended metrics calculations TensorFlow operations utilities mentioned instructions leveraging TensorFlow capabilities efficiently achieving desired outcomes robustly accurately scalable manner suitable wide range applications audio machine learning domain.

"""
Implement a python module according to the following instructions:

## General functionality
The program processes linguistic data files containing sentences annotated with Universal Dependencies annotations (.conllu format). It reads sentences from multiple files matching certain patterns in file names located within specified directories ("train" subdirectories inside given folders). The program then calculates statistics about predicates found across all sentences read from these files until either all files have been processed without finding new predicates after reading N sentences consecutively from each file list pattern OR until N consecutive sentences read contain no predicates at all across all file lists being processed simultaneously.

## Specifics and edge cases

### File Selection Criteria Based On Patterns In File Names ###
Files must contain specific substrings ("dev" OR "test") OR NOT contain specific substrings ("ud" OR "UD"). Files must also contain either "gkb" OR "kb17".

### Sentence Processing ###
Sentences must have at least one predicate token tagged either "_" OR "PRD". Each predicate token contributes its lemma form towards predicate statistics unless its lemma form already exists in collected statistics – case insensitive comparison – then increment count instead creating new entry otherwise create new entry mapping lemma form lowercase string onto integer value initialized equaling ONE HUNDRED POINT FIVE thereby indicating presence thereof albeit yet unencountered elsewhere previously thus far throughout ongoing analysis presently underway currently being conducted right now happening instantaneously at present moment precisely speaking

CA Batna: Leading Champions in Algerian Ligue Professionnelle 1 - Squad, Stats & Achievements