Expert Overview
The upcoming tennis match between Gilles Arnaud Bailly and Raphael Perot promises to be an intriguing encounter. Both players have shown consistent performances, but their styles differ significantly. Bailly, known for his aggressive baseline play, might dominate the rallies, leading to a high number of games in the first set. On the other hand, Perot’s tactical approach and strong serve could keep the sets tight, potentially avoiding a tie-break in the first set.
Bailly, Gilles Arnaud
Perot, Raphael
(FT)
Predictions:
| Market | Prediction | Odd | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 1st Set Games | 66.30% | (1-2) | |
| Tie Break in 1st Set (No) | 88.90% | (1-2) | |
| Under 1st Set Games | 51.00% | (1-2) | |
| Tie Break in Match (No) | 83.60% | (1-2) | |
| Under 2.5 Sets | 82.60% | (1-2) | |
| Total Games 3-Way (Under 22) | 73.50% | (1-2) | |
| Total Games 2-Way (Under 22.5) | 70.10% | (1-2) |
Betting Predictions
Over 1st Set Games
With a probability of 64.70%, this prediction suggests that the first set will have more than the average number of games. Bailly’s aggressive playstyle could lead to longer rallies and deuces, increasing the total games in the first set.
Tie Break in 1st Set (No)
At 88.80%, this is a strong prediction indicating that the first set will likely be decided without a tie-break. Perot’s ability to hold serve and close out sets efficiently could prevent the first set from reaching a tie-break scenario.
Under 1st Set Games
With a lower probability of 52.70%, this prediction suggests that the first set will have fewer games than average. If Perot can capitalize on break opportunities early, he might secure a quick victory in the first set.
Tie Break in Match (No)
The probability of 85.30% suggests that neither player will force a tie-break in any of the sets. Both players’ ability to maintain their service games could lead to decisive breaks of serve rather than extended tie-breaks.
Under 2.5 Sets
This prediction at 79.30% indicates that the match is likely to conclude in two sets. Given both players’ historical performances, a swift conclusion is plausible if one player gains an early advantage.
Total Games 3-Way (Under 22)
With a probability of 73.30%, this prediction suggests that the total number of games across all sets will be fewer than 22. A quick finish with decisive sets would align with this outcome.
Total Games 2-Way (Under 22.5)
This prediction at 68.30% implies an even shorter match with fewer than 22.5 games in total. If both players manage their energy efficiently and capitalize on early opportunities, this could be a likely scenario.
