Expert Overview: Roncadelli vs Gima
On August 12, 2025, at 13:05, Franco Roncadelli faces Sebastian Gima in a highly anticipated tennis match. Both players bring unique strengths to the court, making this encounter intriguing for enthusiasts and bettors alike. Roncadelli, known for his aggressive baseline play, often pushes matches to the limit, while Gima’s strategic serving and return game have proven effective in tight situations. This matchup promises an engaging contest with potential for extended rallies and strategic depth.
Roncadelli , Franco
Gima, Sebastian
(FT)
Predictions:
| Market | Prediction | Odd | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 1st Set Games | 52.50% | (1-2) 1-6 1st Set 2.10 | |
| Tie Break in 1st Set (No) | 80.30% | (1-2) | |
| Under 1st Set Games | 71.50% | (1-2) 1-6 1st Set 1.22 | |
| Tie Break in Match (No) | 68.30% | (1-2) | |
| Under 2.5 Sets | 64.80% | (1-2) | |
| Total Games 2-Way (Over 22.5) | 56.60% | (1-2) |
Betting Predictions
Set Game Outcomes
The prediction for “Over 1st Set Games” stands at 54.90, suggesting that the first set may be competitive with a higher number of games played. Conversely, “Under 1st Set Games” is favored at 67.50, indicating a likelihood of a swift conclusion to the initial set.
Tie Break Probabilities
The odds against a tie break in the first set are quite high at 79.00, hinting at a decisive outcome within the regular games. Similarly, the probability of avoiding a tie break in the entire match is set at 65.00, suggesting that one player may dominate enough to secure victory without needing tie breaks.
Match Set Predictions
With “Under 2.5 Sets” predicted at 69.10, there is a strong expectation that this match could conclude in two sets rather than stretching into a third, indicating potential dominance by one player.
Total Games Forecast
The “Total Games 2-Way (Over 22.5)” is predicted at 57.30, suggesting that while there may be an early resolution to the match, the total number of games played could exceed 22.5 if the contest extends beyond a straightforward conclusion.
